|
|
#1 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,914
|
CCCAM 2.3.0 is taking the backdoor crap even a step further.
The lowest scum of the earth, UVADI TEAM, have done it even better this time. Making sure sharing will die for sure if they keep this crap up. Before I continue, I would urge people with BRAINS and PROGRAMMING SKILLS, to download IDA PRO (torrent) and decompile it for themselfs to find the remotely triggered backdoor. How it works. When you install CCcam 2.3.0 , nothing special is happening at first, and cccam will check for input activity on the pc or box to make sure nobody is watching. When it finds itself comfortably alone, it will start sending your ENTIRE CCCAM.CFG info to this IP 176.9.242.159 (a rented root server in germany). Now I recompiled a version so I could trigger the backdoor myself, and TADA, some fucking ITALIAN dialup asswipe connected to the server I just set up , IP : 2.32.190.9. So traffic on my card started. THIS THEY CAN NOT HIDE in Cccam, it shows as a CONNECTED CLIENT from one of your clients in cccam.cfg where the dyndns has been removed (still lack of cccam, if dyndns is non-existing) the security feature doesn't work anymore and everybody can connect on that user. The ...ure of CCcam is dead thanks to these low life asswipes , just after free sharing and making their own "spidernetwork" on your card. BLOCK ALL CLIENTS that have 2.3.0 connected to your server as it will still read all connected clients from the server, trough the client ![]() latest original CCcam 2.1.3 and 2.1.4 which are secure and don't have this backdoor code. ps: AGAIN , if you don't want to take the warning for granted, decompile and look for yourself ![]() ![]() !2.1.3...2.1.4 only clients. 2.2.1 ..2.3.0 is big shit Please tell these information to your peers
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 26
|
FAKE
@admin try to open the IP 176.9.242.159 in webbroswer
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 19
|
Thk for info,
... and what do u mine about Cccam 2.0.11 ? Regards |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,914
|
2.011. 2,11, 212 213 and 214 are oke
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 19
|
Thk
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 45
|
thx admin
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 139
|
Thanks for sharing your info
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 106
|
hey sticky how ya doing,, i am using 2.2.1 is that bad? what can i do about it , i'm worried.
i have 4 peers i'm sharing cards with, how do i know if they are taking advantage,,?? thanks for your time.. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,914
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 230, cccam, warning |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.